Sabine Hossenfelder

ExpertScience@SabineHossenfelder 1.8M subscribers

As simple as possible, but not any simpler! Science and technology updates and summaries. No hype, no spin, no tip-toeing around inconvenient truths. Currently 5 videos a week (Tue-Wed-Thu and Sat-Sun). Early access for channel members. Sabine Hossenfelder has a PhD in physics. She is author of the books "Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray" (Basic Books, 2018) and "Existential Physics: A Scientist's Guide to Life's Biggest Questions" (Viking, 2022). Views are my own and do not represent any institution. Represented by Fixated.

From their YouTube channel

Traits

How well Sabine Hossenfelder teachesNo votes yet

Three things people rate Sabine Hossenfelder on, besides the Standing: tap a number on each, no account needed, and you can take it back. Rate the work, not their looks or identity.

AccurateHow accurate is what they teach?

Not scored yet · 0 of 5 raters

Explains clearlyHow clearly do they explain things?

Not scored yet · 0 of 5 raters

OriginalityHow original is their work?

Not scored yet · 0 of 5 raters

A tap weighs a little and never publishes on its own. Sign in to carry your full weight.

0 of 20 ratings Standing publishes at 20

How this number works

Standing is the average of everyone’s 1–5 star ratings on a 0–100 scale: 3 stars is 50, 4 stars is 75. Careful, long-standing raters count for more than new accounts, and older ratings slowly fade. A new rating counts after 36 hours. Nothing is shown before 20 ratings, and a sudden flood of ratings freezes the number until a moderator reviews it. The full method

RateBe the first to rate · takes about 20 seconds

Compare Embed

Accuracy

Read on journalists, commentators, politicians, outlets and high-stakes topics. Each publishes at 20 calls. Lean is direction, never quality: it never moves the Standing.

Does Sabine Hossenfelder get the facts right?

No account needed. One tap, and you can take it back.

Gets the facts right?

Nobody has rated this yet. Yours would be the first.

AccuracyNot published · 0 of 20

Accurate —Mixed —Misleading —

When they make a factual claim, how often the public found it held up. Each call is weighted by the rater’s track record.

Controversies

Fraud, scams, cheating and other issues people have raised, with their sources. Mark each one credible or doubtful.

These are allegations raised by raters, not findings by Internet Standing. The sources are the raters’ own. If an entry is about you, you can respond on the record or file a complaint.

No controversies on record.