Statistically less funny than placebo (p<0.05) Hello, I'm a consultant cardiologist and university researcher that makes science videos and bad jokes. Topics and analysis you won't find elsewhere, fortified with a government-mandated dose of humour, but ultimately clinically useless. There's a lot of bad science on YouTube, especially medicine, with quacks and clowns peddling garbage. I'm not saying I'm not one of them, I'm just stating a fact. Dr Rohin Francis NB - Please don't ask for medical advice as I cannot give any online. Nothing I say is medical advice. How do you even know I'm a doctor? I'm just a Large Language Model medical AI deemed too unsafe to be unleashed on real patients.
From their YouTube channelThree things people rate Medlife Crisis on, besides the Standing: tap a number on each, no account needed, and you can take it back. Rate the work, not their looks or identity.
A tap weighs a little and never publishes on its own. Sign in to carry your full weight.
0 of 20 ratings Standing publishes at 20
Standing is the average of everyone’s 1–5 star ratings on a 0–100 scale: 3 stars is 50, 4 stars is 75. Careful, long-standing raters count for more than new accounts, and older ratings slowly fade. A new rating counts after 36 hours. Nothing is shown before 20 ratings, and a sudden flood of ratings freezes the number until a moderator reviews it. The full method
Read on journalists, commentators, politicians, outlets and high-stakes topics. Each publishes at 20 calls. Lean is direction, never quality: it never moves the Standing.
Nobody has rated this yet. Yours would be the first.
The words raters picked for this record. A word shows once 3 raters have used it; tap one to see the ratings that say it.
Fraud, scams, cheating and other issues people have raised, with their sources. Mark each one credible or doubtful.
These are allegations raised by raters, not findings by Internet Standing. The sources are the raters’ own. If an entry is about you, you can respond on the record or file a complaint.