Economics Explained

Politics@EconomicsExplained2.9M subscribers

Economics Explained is a politics account on YouTube, with 2.9M subscribers.

From this record

Traits

How Economics Explained handles the factsNo votes yet

Three things people rate Economics Explained on, besides the Standing: tap a number on each, no account needed, and you can take it back. Rate the work, not their looks or identity.

Gets facts rightDo they get their facts right?

Not scored yet · 0 of 5 raters

Fair to opponentsHow fair are they to people they disagree with?

Not scored yet · 0 of 5 raters

Owns mistakesWhen they get something wrong, do they correct it?

Not scored yet · 0 of 5 raters

A tap weighs a little and never publishes on its own. Sign in to carry your full weight.

0 of 20 ratings Standing publishes at 20

How this number works

Standing is the average of everyone’s 1–5 star ratings on a 0–100 scale: 3 stars is 50, 4 stars is 75. Careful, long-standing raters count for more than new accounts, and older ratings slowly fade. A new rating counts after 36 hours. Nothing is shown before 20 ratings, and a sudden flood of ratings freezes the number until a moderator reviews it. The full method

RateBe the first to rate · takes about 20 seconds

Compare Embed

Accuracy and lean

Read on journalists, commentators, politicians, outlets and high-stakes topics. Each publishes at 20 calls; on a political record the accuracy reading also waits for 10 established accounts. Lean is direction, never quality: it never moves the Standing.

Where does Economics Explained land?

No account needed. One tap, and you can take it back.

Political lean

Gets the facts right?

Nobody has rated this yet. Yours would be the first.

LeanNot placed yet · 0 of 20

LeftCentreRight

Where people placed itmedian · 0 of 20

FLLCRFR

AccuracyNot published · 0 of 20

Accurate —Mixed —Misleading —

When they make a factual claim, how often the public found it held up. Each call is weighted by the rater’s track record.

Controversies

Fraud, scams, cheating and other issues people have raised, with their sources. Mark each one credible or doubtful.

These are allegations raised by raters, not findings by Internet Standing. The sources are the raters’ own. If an entry is about you, you can respond on the record or file a complaint.

No controversies on record.