@TheEconomist@TheEconomist
0 of 20 ratings, no standing yetTheEconomist on Twitter/X
From their X account0 of 20 ratings Standing publishes at 20
Standing is the average of everyone’s 1–5 star ratings on a 0–100 scale: 3 stars is 50, 4 stars is 75. Careful, long-standing raters count for more than new accounts, and older ratings slowly fade. A new rating counts after 36 hours. Nothing is shown before 20 ratings, and a sudden flood of ratings freezes the number until a moderator reviews it. The full method
Three things people rate @TheEconomist on, besides the Standing: tap a number on each, no account needed, and you can take it back. Rate the work, not their looks or identity.
A tap weighs a little and never publishes on its own. Sign in to carry your full weight.
Read on journalists, commentators, politicians, outlets and high-stakes topics. Each publishes at 20 calls; on a political record the accuracy reading also waits for 10 established accounts. Lean is direction, never quality: it never moves the Standing.
Nobody has rated this yet. Yours would be the first.
The words raters picked for this record. A word shows once 3 raters have used it; tap one to see the ratings that say it.
Fraud, scams, cheating and other issues people have raised, with their sources. Mark each one credible or doubtful.
These are allegations raised by raters, not findings by Internet Standing. The sources are the raters’ own. If an entry is about you, you can respond on the record or file a complaint.
Is this your account? Claim the record to publish a response beside your standing and put the live badge on your site. Claiming never changes the standing.
Claim this record